Wow, what an interesting entry!
It would seem very and mostly business-related at first sight, but as Dr Lam pointed, the principle applies to all "areas" where we have (or should have) some sort of meeting!
I have realized, after reading this, that I had the misconception (not that I had thought of it enough, actually!) that a meeting before a meeting often implied some sort of "cheating" because it could lead to "alliances" and "gang forming" as to later direct the meeting/subject in one direction and "gang" against those who would not have been in the "previous agreement".
I realize now that that was a silly thing to think: sure that sort of "pre-meeting" with shady purposes can take place in some environments, but in most others, talking before talking -so to speak- does not have to be tied to influencing others or censoring others, nor with telling them what to do and say and what not. It can be and should be basically informative, and, indeed, it can be a tool to optimize the meeting, and NOT to distort the evolution of it. Come to think of it, a fair, good "meeting before the meeting" can actually stop the meeting from going nowhere or, yes, creating situations where misinformed, surprised people (since many would not have been aware of some things they could and would benefit from knowing beforehand) could actually start, indeed, ganging against some, or creating simple chaos.
It made me aware, too, of the utility of having that approach in our everyday's life: for something as simple and as complex as broaching up a difficult or touchy subject, or talk about an important decision to make, with, say, your family.
If you know where others stand, more or less, before the meeting, it is easier for people to understand each other, not interrupt each other, etc. etc. and therefore come to a more satisfying conversation for everyone!
Once in a while, my SO and I decide to discuss a topic, and now I realize that a lof ot the times where the conversation slipped to territories that had nothing to do with the original topic, and/or when misunderstandings arose, most if not all of those situations could have been avoided if we had had SOME previous basic knowledge of how things were feeling like or evolving like for each partner. Even without going into details (after all, that's what the meeting is for). How many surprises and misunderstandings we could avoid by checking on how our SO's and the members of our family are doing or thinking concerning different matters before bringing them up out of an impending necessity to make a decision or discuss something regarding those subjects!
This reminded me of something I had forgotten (and should not!). A friend of mine has the good habit of dedicating each week at least one hour to talking with his wife about "whatever". They don't need to have a subject to treat, they don't wait for the subject to come up... they discuss how things have been like that week, what issues are in their minds... and in that way the yare very up-to-date of how the other is feeling and of how things are going like for each. When I think of them, I realize they are of the happiest, more harmonious couples I know. I suspect their addressing where they stand - this having those "meetings before a big meeting needs to take place" has a LOT to do with it.
Thanks for the insight and for the reminder, Dr Lam!
