by dr. lam » Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:29 pm
HI!!!
haven't heard from you for a while. the answer is sort of. the history of fat grafting actually started in 1898 ish with someone cutting out fat from the belly and placing it into the breast to restore the breast contour. obviously, with a big lump of fat there was no blood supply so it did not last.
as far as modern fat grafting techniques, i know of some surgeons who are using fat grafting for breast augmentation but none for post mastectomy or lumpectomy issues (that i know of). here are the concerns:
1. the mid 1980s the plastic surgery society has roundly condemned use of fat grafting for the breast for fear of the calcification that could occur in the breast following a fat graft that may make someone misread a cancer. now more recent thinking (but the official position statement remains) goes against that and says that any calcifications that occur following a fat transfer can be readily distinguished from cancerous varieties. since i have no experience with breast augmentation, i cannot speak with certainty nor do i have experience with fat grafting for the breast (and have no interest in doing so) nor do i have experience with breast cancer so she should do her own research.
2. i truly believe that the fat coming from the belly or thighs has the most resilience toward loss when transplanted and offers also an abundant supply to transplant. that can also be a negative. as i say, i am always fearful of placing fat asymmetrically like to one side because i believe that over time with weight changes the area could look bulgy vis-a-vis non transplanted areas. that is why when i work on a face i perform a very delicate blended treatment rather than target specific areas. hope that makes sense.
thanks for the question!
best,
sml
Samuel M. Lam, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Diplomate, American Board of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Diplomate, American Board of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery
Diplomate, American Board of Hair Restoration Surgery