Hi Dr. Lam,
Thank you very much for your reply. I had some developing questions that I didn't want to write until I was able to consolidate all of them and didn't want you to waste too much of your time replying to every post I make, so hopefully I can get this in one shot. With your corroborating and encouraging feedback, I would have a plan of action and would be worth making the trip all the way from NY to see you in the future, since you're one of the best in the business.
1) I recently had orthognathic le fort I osteotomy done on 11/2009 due to teeth malocclusion and the doctor did a great job. I had told him about my desire to undergo septoplasty/rhinoplasty and he told me I should wait at least 6 months for everything to heal. I told him pretty much everything I had written here and he suggested that I should have a bone graft done on my ANS (anterior nasal spine) to achieve the look of the "tethered pull" at the subnasale and that this is something he can do. He would harvest the part from the chin. The reason for going this route is twofold (correct me if I'm wrong). Firstly, I'm thinking this is the most "natural" way to achieve that "tethered pull" since that new extended ANS would be as if I had one solid piece of bone there without any risk of any implant or cartilage to slip out of place. Secondly, I'm thinking that the septal and ear cartilage a doctor would use to plump up the premaxilla could be reallocated to the tip instead. Someone who is looking for a sharp pointed tip and a strongly projected tip would probably need all the cartilage they can get at their disposal, I assume. This way, none of the scarce cartilage is wasted on the premaxilla and can be used solely for the tip. So the hypothetical plan might be that I have this ANS bone grafting done by my maxillofacial surgeon and then perhaps see a rhinoplasty surgeon like yourself afterward for a rhinoplasty consultation for a strictly nose-only job without worrying about the premaxilla/ANS. Do you agree on the logic of this and does this make sense to you, Dr. Lam?
2) This leads into what I'm looking for from the rhinoplasty. Here are some photos of my profile...
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4067/447 ... d63c_o.jpghttp://farm3.static.flickr.com/2688/447 ... 2f05_o.jpghttp://farm5.static.flickr.com/4050/447 ... abf6_o.jpghttp://farm5.static.flickr.com/4022/447 ... 34a6_o.jpgThe first shot is how I look like currently. The second shot *might* be how I look like after the ANS bone grafting and I simulated this by pulling my columella forward with my fingers. Note the tethered pull at the subnasale and the slight concavity formed on the entire upper lip. In my opinion, curves and curls in the profile line soften up the appearance and is more aesthetically pleasing (notably - the subnasale, the upper lip concavity, the mentolabial fold, etc). For the third shot, I took the first photo and drew in pencil what I'm looking to achieve with rhinoplasty. The fourth shot is identical to the third shot plus notes. Note the slight elevation at the bridge and the upper dorsum. Didn't want to raise it too much since it would look unnatural on an Asian face. The dorsum should be straight until it gets to the part right above the tip at which point should be a noticeable supratip break. The tip itself should be projected and sharp like how I'd drawn, and should have good tip support. Not only is the tip projected outward but slightly downward too, which would lead to more columella show and decrease my nostril show from the front. I also drew in the tethered pull of the subnasale since that would be there by the time I do the rhinoplasty. So in a nutshell, I want to achieve these goals when viewed from the profile. Is this something you can do? Would I have enough cartilage from my septum and ear to achieve that kind of projection and sharpness, without going the rib route? I might want a slightly more projected tip but what I'd drawn is the minimum amount of projection I'm looking for. What I'd drawn probably has slightly more projection and sharpness than what you do for the average Asian patient. And for the bridge/upper dorsum, I suppose you use gortex or silicone (I or L type)?
3) From the frontal view, I would like to have osteotomy done on the nasal bones to reduce the width of the bridge. Maybe a slight general narrowing of the rest of the dorsum and tip too, but this is not so black/white, will have to see. And lastly, slight alar resection to bring in the alar base. I remember reading that you do alar base reductions and it was refreshing because I've heard many doctors refuse to do this since they lack experience and are worried they will leave massive exterior scarring.
I'm sure all aspects of #3 are easily doable. The main questions I had were if it made good sense to do #1 first and also, if the nasal profile described and shown in #2 is possible with just the septal and ear cartilage or other material at the rhinoplasty surgeon's disposal. With your corroborating and encouraging feedback, I would have a plan of action and would be worth making the trip all the way from NY to see you in the future, since you're one of the best in the business.
Thank you in advance for your feedback and for your time,
Paul