by dr. lam » Fri May 16, 2008 4:40 pm
first, fat is very successful in my hands. most docs will talk you out of it because they have no idea what they are doing with fat transfer. even if they tell you, "I tried it and it does not work." That is correct. It does not work in their hands.
as far as restylane is concerned, since 2002 or so, the antigens have been cleaned up reducing the incidence of an allergic reaction from 0.9 to 0.3%. so there is still a risk of allergy. usually, it is just a redness, itchiness, and hardness. to me what you are describing sounds like an infection and lymphatic occlusion, but i might be wrong. honestly, the best thing is fat transfer because it is permanent and with better results but also costs much more and requires anesthesia and a recovery time. the good thing with restylane is that if you get an allergy, i can dissolve out the product and eliminate the allergy within hours. you can't do that with radiesse.
i cannot cite the allergic profile of radiesse but it is very low as well. it is a great product but has a few major drawbacks. it is good for cheek and jawline fills but terrible for lips and under eye fills. too risky. plus, if i want to do fat, it sort of screws up my fat transfer for a year and a half or more since you can't dissolve out the product. the other problem is if you have an allergic reaction with radiesse, there is no treatment for it since the product cannot be reversed. however, as stated, the incidence to allergy is extremely low. like restylane, you are not responding to the product since both products are naturally found in your body but the carrier substance for each product.
best,
sml
Samuel M. Lam, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Diplomate, American Board of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Diplomate, American Board of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery
Diplomate, American Board of Hair Restoration Surgery